Accounting as a system of semantic fixation:a philological perspective on automation and accounting education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64183/d3tr9q03

Keywords:

Accounting Language, Semantics, Automation, Philology, Accounting Education, Interpretation

Abstract

This academic article focuses on a philological analysis in which accounting is viewed not merely as a technique, but as a specialized linguistic system that encodes and stabilizes meanings about a given economic reality. From this perspective, the transition from natural language to normative accounting language is examined, highlighting the deliberate reduction of semantic ambiguity as a necessary condition for automation. The analysis further explores the link between language and technology, demonstrating that artificial intelligence does not truly understand accounting language, but rather operates on semantic structures that have been previously stabilized by standards such as the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). This distinction makes it possible to rethink the nature of accounting knowledge and to question traditional notions of interpretation and objectivity within the discipline. Additionally, the pedagogical implications of this approach are examined, proposing a transformation in accounting education that prioritizes critical thinking, normative interpretation, and an understanding of language as a constructor of reality. It is therefore concluded that the accountant of the new era must assume the role of an active interpreter of accounting discourse, rather than merely an executor of automated operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bender, E. M., & Koller, A. (2020). Climbing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and understanding in the age of data. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5185-5198.

Cabré, M. T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, methods, and applications. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Hines, R. D. (1988). Financial accounting: In communicating reality, we construct it. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(3), 251-261.

Hopwood, A. G. (1992). Accounting and the environment. In D. J. Cooper & T. M. Hopper (Eds.), Critical accounts. Macmillan.

International Accounting Standards Board. (2014). IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. IASB.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Saussure, F. de. (1945). Curso de lingüística general (A. Alonso, Trans.; Obra original publicada en 1916). Losada.

Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. Free Press.

Tua Pereda, J. (2009). Teoría contable. Editorial Thomson Civitas.

van Dijk, T. A. (1999). El análisis crítico del discurso y el estudio del poder. En N. Fairclough & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis. John Benjamins Publishing.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.

Published

2026-07-31

Issue

Section

Ciencias administrativas y educación

How to Cite

Hernández Valdés, G. (2026). Accounting as a system of semantic fixation:a philological perspective on automation and accounting education. Revista Académica Institucional, 9(1), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.64183/d3tr9q03

Similar Articles

1-10 of 118

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.